That’s my suggested title for an article examining how Catholics operating within the American political tradition — or at least Catholics living in America — might come to terms with Pope Benedict XVI’s by now infamous call for “true world political authority” in paragraph #67 of “Caritas in Veritate.” I spent my high school years reading stuff put out by the John Birch Society (whose president is a tertiary of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, btw), so I know that a good number of Catholic rightists are American patriots quite opposed to globalism, either economic or political. So was paragraph #67 ghostwritten by the Bilderbergers/Trilaterals/CFR/Rockefellers/Rothschilds sitting in the Meditation Room at the UN? At the same time, there are traditionalist Catholics who hold that America itself is the cornerstone of the masonic One World Government/New World Order. Hence, our Spirit of ’76 – liberal, capitalist democracy – is identical with the Illuminati’s plan for world government. After all, Adam “Spartacus” Weishaupt founded the Bavarian Illuminati in *1776,* dontchaknow? And then there will be those who demand a new Holy Roman Empire — with “real teeth” this time! – and claim that this is *clearly* what Pope Benedict is calling for. In that scenario, American exceptionalism is evil and we should look forward to the Great Monarch who will incorporate us into a restored universal Christendom.
So, why don’t I write the article myself? I don’t have the time or the interest, that’s why. But I’m sure I can be coaxed into straining some gnats and swallowing a few camels provided you write some responses to this post in which you put forth your own two cents (does Benedict want a world currency, too, I wonder?) on paragraph #67. Or even — dare we?! — about the scores of other paragraphs in the encyclical.
And P.S. — I know that some members of this most august Society spend much time each day on Twitter. Might they spare some minutes once in awhile to hammer out a pithy sentence or two onto our good ol’ blog? For nostalgia’s sake?
St. Louis-Marie de Montfort,
Pope St. Pius X,
St. Joseph,
St. Ambrose of Milan,
St. Thomas Aquinas,
St. Francis (and St. Clare),
St. Catherine of Siena,
St. Alphonsus Ligouri,
St. John Chrysostom,
I hope that last comment doesn’t include me. I think I’ve been reasonably steady in contributions here.
I find this talk of global governance to be, well, a little silly frankly. I mean, I do understand why such a thing would be desirable. But the things this global government is supposed to do (enshrine moral principles concerning life and family, respect subsidiarity, etc.) are just not things that any global government in the world as we know it is going to do. All our experiences with transnational government in the modern era seem to confirm this. So why talk about it, if it will never happen? It just gives fuel to organizations like the EU or the UN that certainly militate against subsidiarity and other Catholic principles in multiple ways.
I guess another way of putting this might be: nothing about this plan inclines me towards disobedience exactly. If such a transnational government could ever be achieved, then great. I have no objection in theory. But do I have any obligation to take remotely seriously the possibility of this actually happening? That’s tough to swallow.
“I hope that last comment doesn’t include me. I think I’ve been reasonably steady in contributions here.”
Oh good grief, no — in part, it was your similar complaint from awhile back that prompted me to post more frequently. The guilty know who they are.
“The guilty know who they are.”
:)