Silver linings

About two weeks ago, I realized that Barack Obama was going to be elected as our next president — and, indeed, that we’re soon going to see the advent of the most liberal government that the United States has ever had. It was a bitter thought for a few hours. I reserve the right to get bitter about it again sometime before election day, but mostly I think I’m over it. I mean, yes, this probably does mean that the laws protecting the legal slaughter of innocent children will be extended for a considerable period in the future. It’s also likely to mean a slate of policies of a sort that will further the dissolution of community and family life, particularly among the poor where the effects of this are most grim. These are great tragedies. And I haven’t so entirely given up that I’m not planning to cast my (swing state!) vote on election day, but frankly, at this point, I don’t want to dwell on this more than I have to. The world is full of pain and sin, and we’d drive ourselves crazy if we took it all personally.

Actually, we moderns are pretty good at blocking out pain and sin, which is necessary because our newspapers are filled with reports of them day in and day out. Most of the time we don’t even bother to read the details, knowing how powerless we are to do anything anyway. Elections feel more like our business if only because we’re supposed to vote in them, but honestly, we’re mostly impotent there too. I sometimes like to use them as an “apologetic moment” because of the heightened interest in politics at that time, and also because, in my mind at least, this is the closest a Catholic moral philosopher can come to fulfilling her civic duty. (But of course, I’m a pretty small-time moral philosopher at the moment, so my apologetic moments mostly come in the form of arguing with liberal friends or strangers on buses. And posting on this blog, I suppose. Maybe someday I’ll find slightly better venues for this sort of thing. :)) But the truth is, I just don’t feel at all connected to American politics. To be frank, it mostly feels like somebody else’s problem to me, so when liberals want to do fool things (like putting a young random with no executive experience, a raging Messiah complex, and a standard slate of naive liberal views into the White House) I’m somewhat inclined to shrug and say, “Well, it’s your funeral.”

Actually, it might really be my funeral too, but I think funerals are less scary for orthodox Catholics than they are for liberals.

And this is first of the “silver linings” that make me more stoical about the coming liberal heyday. When you’re a liberal, political defeat is agonizing because politics is really the primary sphere of goodness for you. If you think that our highest aspiration in life should be the building of a just political society, it’s hard to think what could compensate for failure in this realm. Those of us who realize that a fully just society will never be achieved on earth anyway, that every age will have a considerable share of suffering and sin, and that, for reasons somewhat mysterious to us, God sometimes deems it best to let the wicked prosper for a period, will find it easier to relax a bit about some little thing like an election. Bad times have often been a catalyst for some very good things — the raising up of martyrs, for instance, or the opportunity to win more converts to the faith. Anyway, the Book of Revelation assures us that the world will be steeped in sin and chaos just before the end of days. Perhaps it’s a sign of how much the human race has endured that quite a lot of people over the course of history have looked at the depravity of their societies and thought, “hey, we must be nearly there!” I won’t be so naive as to make any confident predictions, but it’s always a cheering thought when things start looking bad. “End of days coming, just perhaps?”

Even if we’re not at the end of days, though, the further dissolution of Western society can always open up other opportunities. Here’s the way to think about it: in the immediate future, our government is likely to sink further into liberal depravity, just as things are getting better within the Church. Our politicians have been looking pretty bad, but our much-maligned American bishops (not all of them, but definitely some) have been positively inspiring lately! Looks to me like the culture wars are just going to keep raging, but perhaps we’ve reached the point where our Catholic leaders will be willing to assume some prominent role in them. The worsening of American society could actually help to restore integrity to the American Church. That’s certainly a happy thought.

And here’s another: given the makeup of American society, a strong Church would certainly mean more converts. Probably we’d lose some people too; for years now the Church has harbored scores of liberals who think that it is perfectly okay to give the views of the liberal establishment much more credence than the teachings of the Magisterium. If the climate changed in the way I hope, things would get steadily more uncomfortable for those folks, and a lot would probably abandon ship. But as sad as it is, those are the folks for whom being Catholic is probably doing more harm than good at this point. They’re not reforming their lives, but they are committing sacrilege on a regular basis by presenting themselves for Communion. We’ll pray for them to have a change of heart and come back. In the meanwhile, the converts we might make in their place would be of quite a different sort. I’m thinking now of all those Evangelicals, many of whom deserve a better home than they’re getting right now.

Let me just say this right now: for all the pleasure I sometimes get from poking fun at them, I love the Evangelicals. They are the primary reason why the United States of America could not be transformed in short order into another Canada or Sweden. On the significant moral issues that grip our society, we Catholics have better theology, and thus can give more complete explanations for the wrongness of abortion, same-sex marriage, fetal stem cell research and so on. But the Evangelicals also have something we don’t: numbers. Lots of zealously pro-life and pro-marriage people, and they also seem to have a more vibrant culture than we do, which helps them to foster the same attitudes in their kids. You’ve got to hand it to the Evangelicals — they’ve done a lot in the past decade or two. It’s quite an accomplishment to be hated by the liberal establishment as much as we Catholics are. Of course, the trouble with Protestants is that, being mostly rootless and without solid organization, it’s hard to know how long their moment will last. But if the coming years are as bad as it looks like they might be, we might be able to reward some of these Evangelicals with the best prize of all: Roman citizenship.

Catholics have paid a heavy price in recent decades for their assimilation into mainstream American culture. But, without celebrating that development per se, we can at least be glad of this benefit: the Protestants no longer instinctively mistrust us as they mostly did fifty years ago. Increasingly, Evangelicals are coming to see Catholics as allies in their battles against abortion and in their defense of the family. Evangelicals, like all Protestants, are mostly afflicted with a kind of historical amnesia, and in this case it could work to our advantage. They’re quite ready to see the Church in an entirely different light from their grandparents and great-grandparents. If things started to turn ugly on the political front, and if our Catholic bishops and other officials were to step up and take a strong role in leading the resistance, that would inspire serious respect in the ranks of the Evangelicals. And particularly if some of their own leaders were more ambiguous or less unified in their message, who knows how many might start to look with increasing interest towards Rome? There have been a number of periods in history when swimming the Tiber became an almost trendy thing to do in certain quarters. We’ve already been seeing the beginnings of such a period here in the West, and setbacks on a political front might be just the thing that’s needed to help turn that trickle into a waterfall.

Let me be clear at the end here that this is not just a sour-grapes post. I don’t want Obama to be elected, and if something wonky happened and McCain pulled it out instead, I’d definitely be in a celebratory mood. (I was also very cheered to see that Proposition 8 in California has been making a comeback — to be honest, I’d given up on that one too, but I won’t deny that I would be quite delighted if the Protect Marriage people managed to win an improbable victory there.) On the other hand, it’s nice to realize that, for us Catholics (unlike for the liberals), unwelcome political developments can never be cause for despair. Not to be all cliche, but when you’ve got God on your side, you really can’t be beaten in the long run. And when you compare our country to Canada our Western Europe (places, that is, where the conservatives have pretty much just lost), you realize how many reasons we have to be grateful. Even if we can’t save all the unborn children, or restore the institution of marriage to its natural dignity, our continued efforts might nonetheless help us to save the souls of some others. So get excited! Laborers are needed, and the fields are ripe for the harvest.

11 Responses to “Silver linings”


  1. 1 Henry Oct 15th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    But the Evangelicals also have something we don’t: numbers.

    I’m not sure I understand your argument here. Aren’t there more Catholics than Evangelical Protestants in the U.S.?

  2. 2 Clara Oct 15th, 2008 at 4:28 pm

    If you count as a Catholic anyone who has been baptized in a Catholic church, then probably yes. Even if you count all those who self-identify as Catholic, we might have more. It’s sort of hard to count the Evangelicals since there isn’t any real consensus over who qualifies.

    But a large percentage of these self-identified Catholics are basically heretics. That is, they don’t feel that they have any obligation to defer to the teachings of the Magisterium, even on issues like abortion where those teachings are completely unambiguous and posed in the strongest language. So, if you only count orthodox Catholics — those who take the faith and its teachings seriously — I’m fairly sure that the Evangelicals outnumber us by a pretty good margin.

  3. 3 Clara Oct 15th, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    Just did a little quick checking, Henry. Approximately 35% of Americans identify themselves as Evangelical or Born-Again Christians. Catholics comprise more like 25%. So yes, even counting the liberal Catholics, the Evangelicals still have more.

  4. 4 Anonymous Oct 15th, 2008 at 7:28 pm

    Clara,
    Whenever I’m thinking along these lines about Evangelicals entering the Church, I hear on Moody radio (which I sometimes listen to for the reasons you mention) how a number of the big-name leaders in it were raised Catholic but left the Church, and I also hear them saying distinctly anti-Catholic things, extolling the Reformation, etc. They don’t even consider us Christians.
    Anyway, I don’t mean to tarnish your silver linings … perhaps the ultimate point I should make is that we need to pray for the Evangelical leaders as ex-Catholics: there is a whole story there of misunderstanding, hurt, or rebellion, and ironically, perhaps part of the reason why the leaders are the leaders is that they have a certain clarity in their doctrine owing to their childhood catechesis in the Church.

  5. 5 Clara Oct 15th, 2008 at 9:03 pm

    Oh, sure, and it’s not hard to understand how this would have happened. Lots of people have had bad experiences in the Church in the last few decades. Hardly surprising that some would have fled to Evangelical Protestantism. And those are obviously the ones that would be hardest to get back. I’m not imagining that we could convert every Evangelical.

    But not all of them are bitter and anti-Catholic. I’ve known plenty who have pretty positive feelings towards Catholics. They have various beefs too, of course. Some mainly stem from a fairly superficial understanding of certain Catholic doctrine; others have to do with worship style. I’ve heard people, for example, who praise the Church for “being firm on doctrine” while at the same time complaining that Catholics don’t know how to “get excited about Jesus.” But those are the sorts of people who might possibly be reached.

    Another thing: it’s not unusual to hear about high-profile Protestants who were Catholic in childhood, had bad experiences, and perhaps left the Church sometime in adolescence. That definitely happens. But how often do you hear about prominent adult Catholics joining the Evangelicals? I can’t think of any. Whereas we have in recent years seen some prominent Evangelicals come over to Rome.

    Just saying it’s an opportunity, that’s all.

  6. 6 Steve Oct 16th, 2008 at 5:45 am

    Pray for the renewal of Christendom!

    http://www.corpuschristianum.org

  7. 7 Henry Oct 16th, 2008 at 10:25 am

    So, if you only count orthodox Catholics — those who take the faith and its teachings seriously — I’m fairly sure that the Evangelicals outnumber us by a pretty good margin.

    Truly, Clara. It’s often said that former Catholics comprise the country’s largest religious group. Orthodox Catholics may be the smallest!

  8. 8 Adam Oct 16th, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    Sigh. This post is the conservative equivalent of the “I’m moving to Canada if Bush wins” lament of liberals in 2004. Gimme a break.

  9. 9 Lex Orandi Oct 16th, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    Clara,

    American society has very little to do with what a Catholic society would look like. Whether or not Obama or McCain is elected, that’s really the issue. Catholics have been an appendage since the beginning. Most of the prominent Catholics (at least right now) are those who profess a syncretistic Catholic-evangelical model (Deal Hudson, George Weigel, RJ Neuhaus, Michael Novak, et al.). I don’t really see the gain if evangelicals join us or not. I do see a loss of they co-opt us: American Catholicism is already attenuated enough.

  10. 10 Clara Oct 16th, 2008 at 5:49 pm

    Actually, Adam, I think the spirit of my post is practically the opposite from the whole “moving to Canada” schtick. What that tired expression mainly communicated was that a) I can’t possibly live with you people and b) political failure is failure, period. Which, really, is what liberals are inclined to think, because for them the political sphere is the one in which the “redemption” of the human race (anyway the closest they have to such a thing) has to be achieved.

    By contrast I think that we can still live fairly happily with our fellow Americans, and I definitely deny that political success is the only kind that should matter to us. As my post should make clear.

    Lex Orandi — Not to sound all pious, but I was thinking that the main “gain” of converting Evangelicals relates to the souls of the Evangelicals themselves. Of course conversions should also be a source of joy to the already-converted, both because we take pleasure in witnessing their happiness, and also because conversion produces more companions for ourselves. But shouldn’t we always be thinking about how to win the world back for Christ? And wouldn’t converting others to the faith be one of the primary ways to do that?

    Having said all of this, I think I understand where you’re coming from, and honestly I’m not the sort of person who’s constantly pounding the “spread the word” drum. Spreading the word requires having internalized the word, and Catholics haven’t been terribly strong on that score in recent years. When people start talking about “adapting” the message to be more “understandable” to non-Christians or our “separated brethren”, I really get nervous. We definitely don’t have a solid enough grip on the faith to be doing too much “adapting” these days. Really the best way to win people over most of the time is just by solidifying our own communities and staying true to what we believe. You don’t need to dress it up or dumb it down to make it appealing; the Catholic message has a pretty powerful pull without any of those antics.

    However, my main proposed “strategy” for wooing the Evangelicals was simply by being strong and solid on politically relevant moral issues of our time (abortion, marriage, etc.), where we Catholics really do have the upper hand in terms of both authority (the wimpiness of individual leaders notwithstanding, the Church is never going to give in on these bedrock issues, but Protestants obviously don’t have as firm a foundation) and also theological justification. In a lot of ways I think these issues have become one of the cornerstones of the Catholic identity of younger Catholics today, and while this isn’t ideal in every respect, it’s something, and it’s something the Evangelicals can respect. We’re not going to lose the faith again by being firmly pro-marriage and pro-life, particularly in a society like this one where there are some real battles to be fought over those issues.

  11. 11 J.R. Benedict Oct 22nd, 2008 at 10:09 pm

    I really liked this post. I’ve quoted quite a bit of it with some Fr. Z style commentary on my blog. I’ve also e-mailed it to some friends.

Leave a Reply




Regina Sacratissimi Rosarii,
ora pro nobis

Dramatis Personae

Ambrosius
    Praeses Noster
Iacobus
    Sub-Praeses
Iosephus
    Magister Bibendi
Doctor Asinorum
    Poeta olim laureatus
Franciscus
    Praesidis Optio
Clara
    Legatus ad mulierculas
Bonifacius
    Vetus animus

    Contact Information

    information
    - at -
    cornellsociety.org
    cornellsociety on twitter


    Sententiae Legendae



    Religiosae Societates



    Loci Traditionalibus



    Bibliopollae Catholici



    Popinae Bene Edendi





    Patrons of our Society


    St. Louis-Marie de Montfort,
    ora pro nobis

    Pope St. Pius X,
    ora pro nobis


    Patrons of our Contributors


    St. Joseph,
    ora pro nobis

    St. Ambrose of Milan,
    ora pro nobis

    St. Thomas Aquinas,
    ora pro nobis

    St. Francis (and St. Clare),
    orate pro nobis

    St. Catherine of Siena,
    ora pro nobis

    St. Alphonsus Ligouri,
    ora pro nobis

    St. John Chrysostom,
    ora pro nobis
    see stats