This is disgusting (PDF warning). Incidentally, where was Joseph Bottum when they needed him? Surely, First Things and its wealthy, dangerously left of right of center patrons had enough money to fly in J. Bottum to do some counseling with the four dissenting justices on the United States Supreme Court! How was it that the Chief Justice and Justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas failed to see that the death penalty - at least in the case of such a mild, humdrum offense as the rape of an 8 year old girl, which sent her to the emergency room for reconstructive surgery - is not in accord with “the evolving standards of decency which mark the progress of a maturing society” (Justice Anthony Kennedy, for the majority)?
Bottum’s pernicious position is based on the same gravely mistaken principle which, apparently, has guided the five justices of the majority in Kennedy vs. Louisiana. In Iota Unum (1985), the philosophical charter of the Catholic traditionalist movement, Romano Amerio wrote: “opposition [to the death penalty] can also stem from the notion that every person is inviolable inasmuch as he is a self-conscious subject living out his life in the world; as if temporal life were an end in and of itself that could not be suppressed without frustrating the purpose of human existence” (430).
Continue reading
St. Louis-Marie de Montfort,
Pope St. Pius X,
St. Joseph,
St. Ambrose of Milan,
St. Thomas Aquinas,
St. Francis (and St. Clare),
St. Catherine of Siena,
St. Alphonsus Ligouri,
St. John Chrysostom,