I’ve had a question concerning Natural Family Planning rattling around in my head for awhile, and a conversation I had today with a non-Catholic persuaded me to finally post it. It’s always a little dangerous getting into these controversial waters, but this is an angle of the topic that we’ve never discussed before, and indeed, I haven’t found much discussion of it anywhere. So I thought I might as well open a thread.
To begin, I should define the ‘Stork Method’ for those readers who haven’t been following all our blog discussions since the winter of ‘05. It is a term coined here at the Cornell Society for a Good Time for a method of family planning that involves, basically, learning nothing about fertility, engaging in marital relations as circumstance and personal whim dictate, and accepting whatever children happen to be conceived thereby. It is recommended by certain members of our Society as the most virtuous means of building a family. Not knowing exactly their mind on the subject I cannot promise to accurately summarize their reasons for endorsing the Stork Method; certainly one interest is to shun utterly any possibility of using NFP as a means of pregnancy avoidance without sufficiently grave reasons. I think, though, that the idea may go deeper than this, and entail a rejection of the idea of ‘family planning’ generally. Proponents of this plan like the idea that children come in God’s time and not ours. They are affronted by the idea that they themselves should assume control over such a sacred event as conception (which does, after all, bring a new soul into existence.) Thus, the Stork Method endeavors to leave the matter in God’s hands.


St. Louis-Marie de Montfort,
Pope St. Pius X,
St. Joseph,
St. Ambrose of Milan,
St. Thomas Aquinas,
St. Francis (and St. Clare),
St. Catherine of Siena,
St. Alphonsus Ligouri,
St. John Chrysostom,