<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter from Jeffrey Bond</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/</link>
	<description>Unity in charity, diversity in truth</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/#comment-15606</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 23:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/#comment-15606</guid>
		<description>BOND'S JIHAD - IS IT CALUMNY OR DETRACTION?

This is a sad occasion, and it appears that Bond had many aiders and abetters in his personal jihad to torture Deacon Levine for the rest of his life.

Mr. Bond appears to be either committing the sin of calumny or detraction. He still seems pretty upset about the failure of Justin Martyr College that he was supposed to head up some years ago. Also, Bond seems upset about Levine extricating himself as a defendant from some lawsuit Bond is occupying himself with nowadays. As Bond may admit, neither Deacon Levine nor Bond were responsible for the alleged actions of the former SSPX priests, Carlos Urrutigoity and Eric Ensey. Although Mr. Bond paints with quite a broad brush, Mr. Bond himself has stated in the past that there was no evidence that neither Bond nor Deacon Levine was involved with the alleged molestation of boys or young men. Deacon Levine may be guilty of giving support for too long (as defined by the apparfent calumnor\ detractor Bond) of a man that Levine believed to be other than said man apparently was. I think that in today's atmosphere, where priests are considered guilty until proven innocent, the local Bishop would have investigated this matter very thoroughly (especially since Bond has been there every step of the way), and found that there was no impediment to Deacon Levine becoming a priest.

Levine has never been accused of abuse, even by the rabid Bond, who knows better than to step over that line (one hopes).

So the question is, will Bond repent of his apparent sins, and what does Bond actually do for a living since the College of St. Justin Martyr does not appear to exist? Why is Bond still referred to as the president of a college that has never existed? This is all very suspicious in the "Bondian" worldview.

I believe that Bond himself once had an association with the SSJ. Should this also be held against Bond for the rest of his life? Will Bond not rest until any and all in some way associated with the SSJ, after the point in time Bond has deemed too long, are prevented from doing anything useful in their lives??

Should you, then, be participating in this apparent calumny or detraction by even publishing his missives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOND&#8217;S JIHAD - IS IT CALUMNY OR DETRACTION?</p>
<p>This is a sad occasion, and it appears that Bond had many aiders and abetters in his personal jihad to torture Deacon Levine for the rest of his life.</p>
<p>Mr. Bond appears to be either committing the sin of calumny or detraction. He still seems pretty upset about the failure of Justin Martyr College that he was supposed to head up some years ago. Also, Bond seems upset about Levine extricating himself as a defendant from some lawsuit Bond is occupying himself with nowadays. As Bond may admit, neither Deacon Levine nor Bond were responsible for the alleged actions of the former SSPX priests, Carlos Urrutigoity and Eric Ensey. Although Mr. Bond paints with quite a broad brush, Mr. Bond himself has stated in the past that there was no evidence that neither Bond nor Deacon Levine was involved with the alleged molestation of boys or young men. Deacon Levine may be guilty of giving support for too long (as defined by the apparfent calumnor\ detractor Bond) of a man that Levine believed to be other than said man apparently was. I think that in today&#8217;s atmosphere, where priests are considered guilty until proven innocent, the local Bishop would have investigated this matter very thoroughly (especially since Bond has been there every step of the way), and found that there was no impediment to Deacon Levine becoming a priest.</p>
<p>Levine has never been accused of abuse, even by the rabid Bond, who knows better than to step over that line (one hopes).</p>
<p>So the question is, will Bond repent of his apparent sins, and what does Bond actually do for a living since the College of St. Justin Martyr does not appear to exist? Why is Bond still referred to as the president of a college that has never existed? This is all very suspicious in the &#8220;Bondian&#8221; worldview.</p>
<p>I believe that Bond himself once had an association with the SSJ. Should this also be held against Bond for the rest of his life? Will Bond not rest until any and all in some way associated with the SSJ, after the point in time Bond has deemed too long, are prevented from doing anything useful in their lives??</p>
<p>Should you, then, be participating in this apparent calumny or detraction by even publishing his missives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deacon Levine Will Not Be Ordained May 26 at Cornell Society for a Good Time</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/#comment-15554</link>
		<dc:creator>Deacon Levine Will Not Be Ordained May 26 at Cornell Society for a Good Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/#comment-15554</guid>
		<description>[...] received an email from Mr. Jeffrey Bond last night with the following details: Dear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] received an email from Mr. Jeffrey Bond last night with the following details: Dear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirituality and religion blog &#187; Superior general of suppressed Society to be ordained priest</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/#comment-15500</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirituality and religion blog &#187; Superior general of suppressed Society to be ordained priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 22:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellsociety.org/2007/05/letter-from-jeffrey-bond/#comment-15500</guid>
		<description>[...] Mon May 21, 2007 11:36 am (GMT -5)  Letter from Jeffrey Bond [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mon May 21, 2007 11:36 am (GMT -5)  Letter from Jeffrey Bond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.268 seconds -->
