Archive for September, 2006

In Festo Sancti Michael Archangeli

PRINCEPS gloriosissime caelestis militiae, sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio et colluctatione, quae nobis adversus principes et potestates, adversus mundi rectores tenebrarum harum, contra spiritualia nequitiae, in caelestibus. Veni in auxilium hominum, quos Deus creavit inexterminabiles, et ad imaginem similitudinis suae fecit, et a tyrannide diaboli emit pretio magno. Proeliare hodie cum beatorum Angelorum exercitu proelia Domini, sicut pugnasti contra ducem superbiae luciferum, et angelos eius apostaticos: et non valuerunt, neque locus inventus est eorum amplius in caelo. Sed proiectus est draco ille magnus, serpens antiquus, qui vocatur diabolus et satanas, qui seducit universum orbem; et proiectus est in terram, et angeli eius cum illo missi sunt.

En antiquus inimicus et homicida vehementer erectus est. Transfiguratus in angelum lucis, cum tota malignorum spirituum caterva late circuit et invadit terram, ut in ea deleat nomen Dei et Christi eius, animasque ad aeternae gloriae coronam destinatas furetur, mactet ac perdat in sempiternum interitum. Virus nequitiae suae, tamquam flumen immundissimum, draco maleficus transfundit in homines depravatos mente et corruptos corde; spiritum mendacii, impietatis et blasphemiae; halitumque mortiferum luxuriae, vitiorum omnium et iniquitatum.

Ecclesiam, Agni immaculati sponsam, vaferrimi hostes repleverunt amaritudinibus, inebriarunt absinthio; ad omnia desiderabilia eius impias miserunt manus. Ubi sedes beatissimi Petri et Cathedra veritatis ad lucem gentium constituta est, ibi thronum posuerunt abominationis et impietatis suae; ut percusso Pastore, et gregem disperdere valeant.

Adesto itaque, Dux invictissime, populo Dei contra irrumpentes spirituales nequitias, et fac victoriam. Te custodem et patronum sancta veneratur Ecclesia; te gloriatur defensore adversus terrestrium et infernorum nefarias potestates; tibi tradidit Dominus animas redemptorum in superna felicitate locandas. Deprecare Deum pacis, ut conterat satanam sub pedibus nostris, ne ultra valeat captivos tenere homines, et Ecclesiae nocere. Offer nostras preces in conspectu Altissimi, ut cito anticipent nos misericordiae Domini, et apprehendas draconem, serpentem antiquum, qui est diabolus et satanas, ac ligatum mittas in abyssum, ut non seducat amplius gentes.

(in lingua vulgata)

go to main page

Praying for Deceased Heretics?

As a convert to the Faith whose few Catholic relatives are also converts, I find myself often at something of a loss when, in the Roman Canon, the priest reaches the words

Memento etiam, Domine, famulorum famularumque tuarum N. et N. qui nos praecesserunt cum signo fidei, et dormiunt in somno pacis.

(Remember, Lord, those who have died and have gone before us marked with the sign of faith, especialy those for whom we now pray, N. et N. May these, and all who sleep in Christ, find in your presence light, happiness, and peace.)

I presume that most Catholics, striving to pray the Mass with the priest, will at this time remember their Catholic ancestors among the dead who died “marked with the sign of faith.” I, however, know no one particular for whom to pray who I can reliably presume died with the Faith! I can scarcely presume to call my freemason (I think), Episcopalian grandfather, who died well before I was born, “marked with the sign of faith,” for instance. Now, naturally, there are plenty of Catholics dying in the world whom I can pray for, yet it is hard to form much of an intention with such a vague object. Besides, filial piety and duty (in the sense that Dr. A could tell you more about) makes me long for family and friends for whom I could offer my humble prayers. Turning this over in my mind, it occurred to me that a natural object for such intentions could actually be found among my ancestors: the last Catholics who died with the Faith among my forefathers. For descendents of European Christendom can feel quite assured that, even if their family has been beset by heresy since Luther’s day or before, some pious great great grandfather was laid to rest by his parish priest with the eternal Sacraments of the Church. And for this man we can safely pray; and wisely, for if he truly was the last of his family to hold the Faith until our time, he was not prayed for properly by his children and descendents. Or indeed, one could devote these prayers to the faithful among your ancestry who entered religion, or died childless. But for me, seeking a definite mental image for the aid of my weak will in forming an intention for prayer, nothing answers so well as to think of some neglected gravestones laid, perhaps, in the mid-sixteenth century, upon concecrated ground near a collapsed, or vanished, or disused country Church that marked the resting-place of the mortal remains of a man who might recognize me as kin if he saw me now; and who will certainly know me as such in Heaven, if God’s mercy and grace can save my own poor soul from damnation; who died trusting in God and with the Faith that came to him from the Apostles.
go to main page

The Rules for Restitution

I thought our readers would enjoy reading this casuitical (I hope I’m coining a new word there) exploration from the St. Philipine Duschene Latin Mass Community’s bulletin. It considers the question of restitution at a depth which I did not know it had.

Continue reading

St. Vincent and Hagiography

Last night, Catharina Senensis and I heard Mass at a local Toronto parish under the patronage of St. Vincent de Paul, whose feast day it was yesterday (in the new calendar, at least). This happy occasion, of course, conferred the posibility of us gaining a plenary indulgence, which quickened our feet towards the Mass and our thoughts towards devotion. The parish also, in a worthy practice of which I heartily approved, had a small social after the evening Mass, serving punch for children, sherry and port for adults, and cake for all. At this gathering Catharina S. and I had the good fortune of meeting the founding blogress of the League of Evil Traditionalists, membership in which Iosephus has been known to crave, and to enjoy her lively conversation over several glasses of the parish’s port.

Delightful as all of this was, my point in writing this is not merely to rejoice in a parish that honors its patron in so worthy a manner.But what actually occasioned this brief burst of prose was the homily preached at the Mass of St. Vincent de Paul, wherein the priest, among other worthy topics, gave an overview of St. Vincent’s biography. My purpose is not to reiterate that biography, but to say that it was clear that the priest took some care in giving a picture of St. Vincent as, not only the saint he was when he went to God, but also the sinner he was before God’s grace made him a saint. Not that St. Vincent was ever a very bad man, but he (for instance) in his seminary days forced a poor uncle of his to visit him through the back door of his residence, an act which subsequently haunted him. Learning this of St. Vincent, though, reminded me of the importance of presentation and balance in writing and telling hagiography, if it is to be of spiritual benefit to its readers. For though some saints’ lives are simply incomprehensible to us and worthy of wonder, but are too foreign to occasion real imitation, many are the saints whose lives are stories of God’s grace overcoming a nature as sinful and common as any of has. And whilee a desire to pull down the saints to our own sinfulness is really only a result of our pride, their victories over sin can best give us aid in our own battles with Satan if we can be shown the reality of the temptation and not just the glory of God’s grace well received. In this vein, I was listening to an old recording of Mother Angelica’s television show in the car a few days ago, wherein Mother made much the same point: that some lives of saints paint such a fixed and shiny picture of the saintly life that the sinful soul is driven down into despair; for indeed, her comments were occasioned by a caller who expressed just such a sentiment.

So let us always remember, as the holy ones themselves were ever wont to tell us: the sanctity of the saints proceeded from God alone; the work of their holiness was in permitting Him to work in their lives. So can it be for each of us, in our station in life. God alone can make our soul beautiful and pleasing; we must not judge His working, but trust in the majesty of His grace, turning ever to Him in trust and love, with a firm Faith that our sins have been washed in the blood of the cross and a sure Hope that we too can be saints if we but permit God to transform our lives.
go to main page

Cornell Style Christianity

Although we rarely have anything interesting to report from the home front in our unceasing war on the Cornell Catholic Community, I thought our readers might be amused by the response to the Pope’s big speech that ran in today’s bulletin (Warning Word Document). The crucial part:


He quoted a documented conversation which took place in the late 14th century. The quote was outrageous in its limited characterization of Mohammed. (The entire paper is available at http://www.vatican.va.)

Having used such a volatile quote the Holy Father could have immediately conveyed his (and the Church’s) own disgust at such a polarizing comment. Perhaps it would have been more prudent had he used an example from our own Catholic history: perhaps an episode from the Crusades, or the events of the Inquisition, or our early missionary efforts in the Americas. To say that he was sorry for the reaction his comments seemed self-serving at best. As a man whose office carries the title Vicar of Christ - Christ who was the embodiment of forgiveness and reconciliation - the Pope not only missed an opportunity but, I feel, diminished his own (and our) credibility.

The official statement of the Church concerning Islam is expressed by the conciliar document Nostra Aetate (Declaration on the Relations of the Church to non-Christian Religions, 28 October 1965): ‘The Church has also a high regard for the Muslims. They worship God, who is one, living and subsistent, merciful and almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has also spoken to men (sic). They strive to submit themselves without reserve to the hidden decrees of God, just as Abraham submitted himself to God’s plan, to whose faith Muslims eagerly link their own. Although not acknowledging him as God, they venerate Jesus as a prophet, his virgin Mother they also honor, and even at times devoutly invoke. Further, they await the day of judgment and the reward of God following the resurrection of the dead. For this reason they highly esteem an upright life and worship God, especially by way of prayer, alms-giving and fasting.’ The document goes on to acknowledge the “quarrels and dissension” that have arisen between Christians and Muslims and “urges a sincere effort be made to achieve mutual understanding. For the benefit of all, let (us) together preserve and promote peace, liberty, social justice and moral values.”

One would assume that the Pope was aware of this document since he attended the Council and was one of the signatories of the conciliar document.

Now this really is too much. Could the man be much more submissive if he were officially a dhimmi already? It really does beggar the imagination that anyone could have such a pig-ignorant view of the history of Islam and of his own Catholic Church! Does the dear Father imagine that the sack, rape, and pillage of the great city of Constantinople were accomplished at the “hidden decree of God”? Or is he simply so afraid that the muslims will come after him, since he is a priest of the Catholic Church? If that is his concern, he need not be anxious: the only external sign that he is a priest is his slightly effeminate air; though if and when the muslims are in charge they’d be as happy to kill him for that as for his position in the Church.

And I know is scarcely needs to be said, but to say approvingly that Musliims honor our Lord “as a prophet” is really to have lost the Faith: for Father McMullin should know that Muslims accept Him in that role only by ignoring completely the testimony of the Gospels, which indeed they must, for to be held hostage by the satanic strains of muzzein’s call the Muslim must ignore the saving Faith which came from Christ and which this Priest has here implicitly rejected. If he will not, or can no longer, insist upon Christ’s true mission and divinity, then Father McMullin has abandoned what he was ordained to preach and is endangering his own soul, and all those souls in his care, thereby.

And, by the way, Fr. Ratzinger, Peritus to Josef Cardinal Frings, was not a signatory to that sad document.

Appalling.
go to main page

Robin’s Symbol?

Back at Cornell, we always used to joke about the pink triangular stickers proclaiming “Safe Space” on the chaplains’ doors. Today, I came across what is officially the most terrifying Catholic Gay emblem I have ever seen.

This pteradactyl monstrosity can be found on the official website for the Diocese of Cleveland, here. From His Excellency The Most Reverend Anthony M. Pilla, founder of this legendary ministry, and former President of the USCCB:

Dear Friends,

Through the waters of Baptism God called each of us to be disciples of the Lord. We not only have a place in the Body of Christ, the Church, but all of us share in the mission of building up the Church and witnessing to God’s reign in our joys, struggles, and journey of life.

I have established the Gay and Lesbian Family Ministry to provide pastoral care for our homosexual brothers and sisters and their families in fidelity to the teachings of the Church.

It is my hope that this ministry can be an opportunity for healing and reconciliation.

Most Rev. Anthony M. Pilla
Bishop of Cleveland


go to main page

From the Chiesa Nuova

In other Oratorian news (sort of), Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the Archbishop of Boston, who now has a blog, was recently in the Chiesa Nuova at Rome, saying Mass with his assistant. Having spent a little time in the church myself, and especially before the tomb of St. Philip, this great picture from the Cardinal’s blog caught my eye:


I wonder how many hits his blog is getting?

The Most Masses Since the Protestant Revolt

Still in Oxford at the moment, I thought I’d call your attention to these observations by Brian Mershon writing for the Wanderer about the recent CIEL liturgical conference:

Indeed, in these hallowed halls of Oxford, the spirit of John Cardinal Henry Newman was noticeably present. The reverberating echoes of the living but ancient liturgical music and language, lived out, taught, and inculcated in the midst of Oxford, would have brought a broad smile to the face of this giant figure who once walked these very halls. No fewer than 84 churches, chapels, oratories, and other related once-Catholic monuments and buildings dot the grounds of this one-time bastion of Catholicism.

The Catholic priest from the Oratory who took us on our tour of the Oxford College grounds, Fr. Jerome Bertram, speculated that during this recent conference at the Oratory, where the 25 or so priest attendees offered the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in its ancient Roman form, there may have been more Catholic Masses offered daily [in Oxford] since the Protestant Revolt . . .

I pointed to the happy omen that I think this Catholic takeover may be in comments under my post about the solemn high Mass which concluded CIEL 2006.

Situation in Detroit Improves

This is a few days now since the notice came to me, but I wanted to call it to the attention of those in Michigan who might be interested. I’ve written several posts about beautiful, old churches in Detroit, and about the Tridentine community there. In an happy change of heart at the Chancery, St. Josaphat’s has again received permission to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass according to the Missal of St. Pius V on holy days (in addition to Sundays). The Feast of All Saints is the first feast on which the extension of this indult will take effect. Our thanks to Cardinal Maida.

I also want to call your attention to these Masses, to be offered in the month of October. This from Alex B at the Catholic Answers Forum Tridentine Mass page:

On Sunday, October 22 at 2:00 PM, the FSSP co-founder, Fr. Josef Bisig, will celebrate a Solemn High Mass at St. Michael’s Church for the 15th Anniversary of the Windsor Tridentine Mass Indult. A special choir will sing a polyphonic Mass. A reception for Fr. Bisig will follow in the Parish Hall. This is a rare opportunity to meet the man who collaborated with then-Cardinal Ratzinger to draft the founding documents of the FSSP. Directions are at www.windsorlatinmass.org.

On Sunday, October 29 at 9:30 AM, Fr. Mark Borkowski will celebrate a Solemn High Mass at St. Josaphat Church, commemorating the second Anniversary of the Detroit Tridentine Mass Indult. A special choir, including soprano Melinda Enns, will sing a polyphonic Mass. A fundraising brunch will follow in the Parish Hall. Directions are at www.stjosaphatchurch.org.

go to main page

To Auriesville!

Now that the 11th Annual Auriesville Pilgrimage for Restoration is less than a week away, I will echo Iosephus’ call to join the Cornell Society for a Good Time at the Saturday portion of this wonderful event. Iosephus, Iacobus, Clara, Franciscus, Catharina Senensis, and our most benevolent President, Ambrosius, as well as a further contingent of unnamed but prayerful Cornellians will be in attendance. There is even talk that this group will raise, for the first time in our history, an official Society for a Good Time banner.

Of course, good traditionalist company is not really reason enough to drive many hours to beautiful Fonda, NY. Although the last day of the pilgrimage is scarcely an overly trying penance, the last seven miles of the seventy-two mile journey, accompanied as it is by jubilant song and prayer, is offered to God, for improvement in our own Spiritual Lives, and for the Restoration of True Devotion to Mary, Mother of Divine Love. On the very grounds where the North American Martyrs gave up their lives for God, torn to pieces by the savages they desired to save, a Solemn High Mass will be said by priests of the Traditional institutes.

Padre Pio’s Last Mass

A 60 minute version of this is running on EWTN today. You can watch a shorter cut on the internet here using RealPlayer, which I highly recommend for reasons historical (it is done versus populum, yet another cross for this great Saint, borne partially due to his health, and partially due to evil modernist Franciscans who refused to have it any other way) and spiritual (Pio of Pietrelcina knew he was going to die the following day, September 23rd, 1968). I was most inspired by his Pater Noster(@12:16).

Some Rules for a Good Time

It has been nearly an entire year since the providential founding of our little blog. For some years before that date, a fledgling group of mostly graduate students, usually ranging from three to fifteen in number, met at 9PM every weeknight in a tiny closet. In that closet, waiting, was Our Lord Jesus Christ in His most Blessed Sacrament. Through this small Rosary and Adoration group, by the mighty intercession of the Blessed Virgin, and her faithful children Pope St. Pius X and St. Louis Grignon de Montfort, many Cornellians have been called to the Faith and to Tradition.

As a Society, we seek the very same goods which Don Bosco and his young peers recognized in the nineteenth century: a pleasant society of Christian brethren, suggestions of good Catholic literature, and friendly support in our spiritual lives. Central to our group is that opportunity for lively conversation and debate which so recommends study at a University. Our learned President once revealed our various disciplines, and, despite the prevalence of philosophers, they cover a wide breadth of subjects. More noticeable to readers of our blog is the relatively wide range of opinions we hold despite being traditionalists. From Feeneyites to supposed feminists, we are a pretty diverse bunch of crazy Catholics.

Eventually we decided to found this blog, so we could carry out our live discussions despite conflicting schedules, and our online ones without the inconveniences of email. As we have said repeatedly, that is the character we wish the blog to have. Years from now, when we have all departed from Cornell, we would still like to be having a Good Time, sharing stories and discussing issues, even controversial ones, which are important to our Faith.

It is crucial to us that every discussion on this blog be conducted with Christian Charity. We know that this can be difficult, especially when our interlocutor is merely an anonymous name on a computer monitor. However, it is helpful to remember that here, just as in other parts of our daily lives, we are not called to do what is necessary, but what is perfect.

Very often comments will be made which are improprietous, discourteous, or even blasphemous, and the discussion must be moderated. Unfortunately, this is complicated by our different sensitivities. Since we cannot always agree on the removal of comments, and since our President, whom we would otherwise defer to, has not the time to police them, we have arrived at a compromise solution. Each contributor has the right to deal with the comments under their post in the way they see fit. That is, you own any thread which you start. This is the simplest and most effective policy we can think of.

Know that we are not in any way politically correct, like so many moderns. As Christians, we gladly accept hard sayings. We are willing to listen to your opinions. Nevertheless, we will not always agree with you, even if it is something that you think is crucial to our salvation. If you think the issue is grave enough, then approach it as your duty before God, and not as some zinger you dish off in a debate. Fraternal correction, if it must be done, is an action calling for pronounced gravity, not levity. Moreover, remember that it is almost always better to address someone in private. Our contact information is available – that is what it is there for.

However, the nature of our topics is such that it is easy to bump into this sort of situation. If you think that what we are saying is heresy – by all means, tell us so. We will do likewise. But we must be on guard that our conversations do not devolve into mere orgies of personal criticism. Let us be frank: there is absolutely no good that will come of personal criticism on the internet. In Don Bosco’s days, he and his schoolmates used to address each other’s faults as one of the activities of their Società dell’ Allegria. In person, that sort of thing is possible. While this might one day be a feature of our real life Society, it will never be an online feature. The anonymity we possess here does not aid us by allowing us to make blunt remarks to strangers. Rather, it most dreadfully hinders our ability to make such criticism with true Christian charity.

“There is no accomplishment so easy to acquire as politeness, and none more profitable.” ~ G. B. Shaw

The truth of this saying is easily recognized, even by the heathens. Be polite, be courteous, and use your best manners, for Charity demands it. Yes, there are places and times when you can speak quite bluntly and still be perfectly charitable. We repeat: they do not exist in this medium.

Finally, An Admonishment Concerning Ladies

Another aspect where we differ from our namesake Society is in the gender of our members. While the ideal might be to spin off our female members into a separate Ladies’ Guild, we do not have the numbers to do this. Moreover, our public existence on the internet, that most egalitarian of modern inventions, precludes any sort of gender discrimination. Recognize that this seriously limits the topics we can discuss and the manner in which we can approach them. Modern women may want to cast off Chivalry, but men must stand firm on this point. We cannot allow this. Even if a woman is an outright feminist, a veritable Jezebel, Gypsy, or Harpy, we must treat her as a Lady. If this is an arduous undertaking, as it sometimes can be, let us think often of the Blessed Virgin, and how we might address a daughter of hers, wayward or not. While it is usually easy to understand what is appropriate language in the presence of a Lady, it is often harder to recognize which topics are to be avoided, especially in so androgynous and informal an atmosphere. I think the most important ones are obvious.

However, so that there is a complete absence of any confusion, insofar as our blog is concerned, it is not entirely appropriate for men to debate women at length on subjects including, but not limited to: their intelligence, modesty of dress (including pants), veiling, other difficult issues regarding their personal lives, practical matters concerning sexuality or impurity, or anything dealing in any way with their character. Another helpful rule can be drawn. If the issue is liable to be extremely personal, men and women probably ought not to be arguing about it in public together.

* * * *

Lest, by continuing, we seem to patronize our readers, most of whom are older and wiser, we shall merely indicate that we hope that a thorough consideration of this brief note will lead our readers, and ourselves, to greater enjoyment of a Good Time.

go to main page

Vicar General of Bordeaux: Cardinal Hoyos is a Liar!

Sacré Bleu! We’ve gotten the scoop from a certain Francophone professorial friend of mine that the Vicar General of the Diocese of Bordeaux is none too pleased with the sudden erection of a new Traditional Institute on his territoire. In a statement inconspicuously placed on the Diocese’s website, Père Rouet claims that Cdl. Hoyos has placed disinformation in the decree of erection about the agreement of the Cardinal Archbishop of Bordeaux to the project and rather forcefully “advised” Cardinal Ricard to go meet with Pope Benedict to let him know how traumatizing this is for the Church in Bordeaux — essentially calling the Cardinal-Prefect a liar and publicly ordering his own Bishop to go give the Pope a piece of his mind.

For our readers, we offer a humble translation of the most important passages:

Le décret n° 118-2006 de la Commission Pontificale Ecclésia Dei, reconnaissant l’Institut du Bon Pasteur comme une société de vie apostolique, contient un certain nombre d’affirmations sur l’accord présumé du Cardinal Jean-Pierre Ricard. Ces affirmations relèvent de la désinformation.
The Decree no. 118-2006 of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, which recognizes the Institute of the Good Shepherd as a society of apostolic life, contains a number of affirmations that imply the agreement of Cardinal Jean-Pierre Ricard. These affirmations should be regarded as disinformation

And again,

Je souhaite que dans les semaines qui viennent notre Archevêque auquel je renouvelle ma totale confiance et le service de ma liberté de conseil soit reçu personnellement par le Saint Père lui-même afin de lui faire part de ce que l’Eglise catholique de Bordeaux vit à l’occasion de ces événements.
It is my wish that in the coming weeks our Archbishop, to whom I renew my total confidence and my service as a free advisor, will be personally received by the Holy Father himself so that he can give him some idea of how these matters are affecting the Catholic Church in Bordeaux.

The statement is quite rich with other jabs. He says, for instance, L’expression “messe de toujours” pour un missel en vigueur jusqu’en 1962 est une supercherie historique. (the expression “the mass of all times” for a missal in use only since 1962 is an historical deception). Cardinal Ricard, call your office … and get this guy a leash!

Update. I’ve now read the whole document more carefully. Apparently Father Rouet has ants in his pants over the fact that M. l’abbé Laguérie, the head of this new institute, said some mean and disdainful things about the beautiful works of the French Church during the last thirty years … and has not been ordered to repudiate them! He claims that letting these guys criticise the documents of Vatican II gives permission to the whole “people of God” to question everything the Church says, which, he fears, will lead to “revolution!” The rest is an evocation of the “violences” done by the SSPX in France and de rigeur references to the Spirit of Vatican II; though he does concede that it’s “easy to remember how beautiful the Mass of 1962 was” (it’s “as easy to remember as that spirit of the Second Vatican Council!”).
go to main page

Another reason he’ll move up

Not an insignificant statement, I think, from Archbishop Vincent Nichols of Birmingham, England. In a press release issued on the 17th (PDF), he said:

The thrust of the Pope’s lecture, which so far has been entirely lost, is greatly relevant today. His point is to emphasise the importance of our capacity for reason. He refers to violence only in as much as it is against right reason. He affirms that because it is against reason then it is against ‘the nature of God’. Pope Benedict asks pertinent questions about the relationship of faith and reason in Islam. . . .

This academic lecture by Pope Benedict XVI is perceptive and very relevant. I hope that we will not be distracted by the reaction to it that has been created on the basis of a misunderstanding, deliberate or not, of what he actually said.

I suppose that we can see a couple things happening in issuing this statement. First and most importantly, he is reminding people to look at Benedict’s own words, to see what he really said, in order to see the thrust of the whole speech. But second, I think that Archbishop Nichols is deliberately showing his support for the Holy Father in a public way in a country where such statements of support might not be terribly popular. Cardinal Pell, also speaking in defense of the pope, drew just the right connection between the message of the speech and the subsequent Mohammedan reaction to it.

Continue reading

Brothers and Sisters of Pius II

In 2003 the first two of 13 books in Pius II’s Commentarii appeared as part of a series of Renaissance works from Harvard University Press. I wouldn’t know beans about the Pius II except for my teacher, Reggie, whose favorite pope is Pius II, Aeneas Silvius Bartholomeus de Piccolomini (1405-1464). His Commentarii have the distinction of being, still, the only autobiography penned by a reigning pontiff. The work is of enduring interest, both because of its firsthand accounts of contemporary events as well as because of its smooth, classical Latin prose.

Now I quote from Book I’s initial pages for the delectation of my friend, Iacobus, as well as for the edification and encouragement of others whom I need not name. We read here of Pius II’s father, Silvius:


Hic tamen educatus ingenue litteris ediscendis traditus est; qui liberalibus artibus eruditus ubi adolevit, in militiam profectus variisque casibus actus tandem domum rediit, vendictaque patrimonii tenui portione, Victoriam ex domo Forteguerrarum, qui patroni sunt ecclesiae Senensis, quamvis nobilem virginem tamen pauperem duxit uxorem; quae adeo fecunda fuit, ut saepe gemellos pepererit. Ex ea Silvius duodevinginti liberos sustulit, non tamen ulta decem semel aggregavit, quos urgente inopia Corsiniani (quod est oppidum vallis Urciae) nutrivit. Sed omnes tandem iniqua lues extinxit, duabus tamen sororibus, Laudomia et Catherina, cum Aenea superstitibus.

Educated as a gentleman ought to be, he was directed unto a thorough knowledge of letters; who, once versed in the liberal arts, when he had grown older, joined the army and, having had diverse adventures, returned home, and having claimed a small inheritence, he married a virgin of noble blood, though poor, Victoria, of the house of Forteguerri, who are patrons of the church of Siena; this woman was so fertile that frequently she gave birth to twins. From so rich a soil Silvius reaped a harvest of 18 children, though not more than 10 was his flock at any one time. These he raised, amidst pressing poverty, at Corsignano, which is a town in the Val d’Orcia. But at last the cruel plague snuffed them all out, though there were three survivors: Aeneas and his two sisters, Laodamia and Caterina.

go to main page




Regina Sacratissimi Rosarii,
ora pro nobis

Dramatis Personae

Ambrosius
    Praeses Noster
Iacobus
    Sub-Praeses
Iosephus
    Magister Bibendi
Doctor Asinorum
    Poeta olim laureatus
Franciscus
    Praesidis Optio
Clara
    Legatus ad mulierculas


Contact Information

information
- at -
cornellsociety.org


Sententiae Legendae



Religiosae Societates



Loci Traditionalibus



Bibliopollae Catholici



Popinae Bene Edendi

About

You are currently browsing the Cornell Society for a Good Time weblog archives for the month September, 2006.

Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.





Patrons of our Society


St. Louis-Marie de Montfort,
ora pro nobis

Pope St. Pius X,
ora pro nobis


Patrons of our Contributors


St. Joseph,
ora pro nobis

St. Ambrose of Milan,
ora pro nobis

St. Thomas Aquinas,
ora pro nobis

St. Francis (and St. Clare),
orate pro nobis

St. Catherine of Siena,
ora pro nobis

St. Alphonsus Ligouri,
ora pro nobis

St. John Chrysostom,
ora pro nobis
see stats