<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miracles Mundane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/</link>
	<description>Unity in charity, diversity in truth</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iosephus</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>Iosephus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>You had quite a few locked fire doors to face, Clara, between a future husband and the other members of this Society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had quite a few locked fire doors to face, Clara, between a future husband and the other members of this Society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>Perhaps "love affair" is a little strong, but I (who was part of the Society for a Good Time delegation) am very fond of Chesterton. It is difficult to use him to explore any subject in particular because he is so unsystematic. But both his fiction and his essays are a pleasure to read: funny, insightful and inspiring. He was someone who knew how to live with both feet on solid earth, while still keeping his eyes on eternity.  That is certainly a refreshing thing to find.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt; Though not exactly a "Chesterton convert", I certainly read Chesterton before my conversion, and it was a mark of how I was changing that I initially found him a bit offputting (for being, as I thought then, somewhat distastefully polemical) and then gradually found myself coming to enjoy him more and more. I read his famous work "The Catholic Church and Conversion" a few years before actually becoming Catholic, and then tried to forget about it because I was slightly repulsed, for reasons I couldn't quite explain at the time. I think it was mainly because the essay made conversion sound so unpleasant, whereas I wanted it to be more like a joyous, gradual enlightenment. And maybe for some people it is like that, but in my case, Chesterton must be having a good laugh (good-naturedly, I'm sure), because his description was quite fair. He famously describes the "final stage" before conversion, in which the person suddenly realizes what's happened to him, has a powerful desire to flee, frantically tries all the fire doors and finally realizes that everything is locked. That bit sounded preposterous to me when I read it a few years ago, but oh, yes, I definitely passed through that stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps &#8220;love affair&#8221; is a little strong, but I (who was part of the Society for a Good Time delegation) am very fond of Chesterton. It is difficult to use him to explore any subject in particular because he is so unsystematic. But both his fiction and his essays are a pleasure to read: funny, insightful and inspiring. He was someone who knew how to live with both feet on solid earth, while still keeping his eyes on eternity.  That is certainly a refreshing thing to find.</p>
<p> Though not exactly a &#8220;Chesterton convert&#8221;, I certainly read Chesterton before my conversion, and it was a mark of how I was changing that I initially found him a bit offputting (for being, as I thought then, somewhat distastefully polemical) and then gradually found myself coming to enjoy him more and more. I read his famous work &#8220;The Catholic Church and Conversion&#8221; a few years before actually becoming Catholic, and then tried to forget about it because I was slightly repulsed, for reasons I couldn&#8217;t quite explain at the time. I think it was mainly because the essay made conversion sound so unpleasant, whereas I wanted it to be more like a joyous, gradual enlightenment. And maybe for some people it is like that, but in my case, Chesterton must be having a good laugh (good-naturedly, I&#8217;m sure), because his description was quite fair. He famously describes the &#8220;final stage&#8221; before conversion, in which the person suddenly realizes what&#8217;s happened to him, has a powerful desire to flee, frantically tries all the fire doors and finally realizes that everything is locked. That bit sounded preposterous to me when I read it a few years ago, but oh, yes, I definitely passed through that stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raindear</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>Raindear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>Chesterton has such a fresh, joyful perspective on things.  I enjoy his nonfiction in small increments only, but his short stories are brilliant.  That whimsical, tangential style can be frustrating in more serious works, but it's delightful in a story.  "Man Alive" is my particular favorite.  Any other fans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chesterton has such a fresh, joyful perspective on things.  I enjoy his nonfiction in small increments only, but his short stories are brilliant.  That whimsical, tangential style can be frustrating in more serious works, but it&#8217;s delightful in a story.  &#8220;Man Alive&#8221; is my particular favorite.  Any other fans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catharina</title>
		<link>http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>Catharina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cornellsociety.org/2006/03/miracles-mundane/#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>Never read anything like Chesterton, never loved any writer as I do Chesterton. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I wonder sometimes why - when people can believe that a mom saved her baby from a car accident by blocking the car with her own body, then, didn't even get a little scratch, or they can so easily believe a newpaper saying that in India somewhere some spiritual guru lifted himself up in the air - can they not manage to believe that a Person performed the miracles which were 'written' by the 'witnesses' who were all actually with Him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never read anything like Chesterton, never loved any writer as I do Chesterton. </p>
<p>I wonder sometimes why - when people can believe that a mom saved her baby from a car accident by blocking the car with her own body, then, didn&#8217;t even get a little scratch, or they can so easily believe a newpaper saying that in India somewhere some spiritual guru lifted himself up in the air - can they not manage to believe that a Person performed the miracles which were &#8216;written&#8217; by the &#8216;witnesses&#8217; who were all actually with Him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.532 seconds -->
